The Twisted Dramatic Perspective of Homer and Marge Simpson

The cultural artifact that has been chosen is an episode from the television show: The Simpsons. The episode aired in the evening on the Fox Network in 1997. At the time, this show was competing with other hit series such as The X-files and King of the Hill.  The main premise behind this episode is that Marge is trying to best some of her ex-club members by investing in a pretzel franchise after being kicked out of the group . The main act that will be analyzed is when Homer contacts the local mafia for help after Marge’s business ends up failing. The content will be examined through the Pentad. The five aspects of the Pentad that are used in examining texts from a dramatic perspective are act, agents, agency, scene, and purpose.  The act is using criminal organizations to intimidate and ruin other food franchises. The agents are Homer Simpson and the mafia. The elements of agency are intimidation, violence and attempted murder. The scenes are the rival organizations that are in the same market as Marge. The purpose is to make Marge’s business successful by getting rid of the competition. By applying the dramatic perspective through the Pentad, this episode presents different qualities of what the writers of the series believe exist in married couples. This aspect can be shown by examining the motivation for Homer’s act as transcendence, the use of victimage to absolve Homer’s guilt that came from his behavior and the lack of mortification for Homer’s act.

Marge and Homer Simpson

Homer’s motive can be seen as an example of transcendence which is the show’s way of making a humorous situation out the underlying message that this episode is trying to give. Homer is a character in the show that will always try to support his family but usually does it in ways that break society’s rules for living due to his ignorance and below average intelligence. After Marge fails in selling pretzels, she accepts defeat. Furthermore, she advises her kids to have low expectations in life. After this scene, Homer declares that Marge needs help. He meets with the mafia and this is what he has to say:

You’re my last hope, I never reached out to you before but my wife is in your hour of need. Your help can make all the difference in the world.

It is clear that Homer was acting on the intent of making his wife feel better and thus, was following a higher calling. This act illustrates the bond that Marge and Homer have as a married couple. This brings the idea that married couples always help each other in hard times. Similar references are made later on in the episode.

This is a pretzel town pretty boy. The mob at work.

The use of victimage in this episode also amplifies the idea of how married couples should act with one another. Near the end, Marge confronts Homer about his actions and starts blaming him for hiring the mafia. Homer replies with this:

I saw you poor your heart and soul into this and getting nowhere … So I did what I could, I did what any loving husband would do. I reached out to some violent mobsters.

Marge then realizes that he was only trying to shield her from failure and forgives him. These type of resolutions are common since in the show, Marge is aware of how Homer acts and understands that these types of actions are common due to his intelligence. Homer  can now be seen as a comic-fool which is common in The Simpsons. This type of labeling results in an  example of how a married couple support one another through actions they might not agree upon. This is another example of what the writers’ perceive as a trait that exist in successful couples.

With the absence of mortification, it helps in depicting Homer and Marge as a strong couple. In the last scene, a rival food franchise hires the Japanese Mafia. The Japanese Mafia show up at the Simpsons’ household. As a result, a conflict occurs between the Japanese Mafia and the people that Homer hired. While the fight continues in the background, Homer starts blaming himself for failing every time he tried to help Marge. Marge interrupts him and replies:

I don’t hate you for failing, I love you for trying.

Marge not allowing Homer to punish himself by putting himself down is the last portrayal of the support they give each other. This implies that couples will always try to make each other feel better. Once again, the writers ‘ opinion on marriage is reinforced.

Just a mob war.

In conclusion, each analytical assessment gives an example of a different characteristic that the television show believes exist in married couples. Using Homer’s motive as transcendence implies that a one should support their spouse in any way they can. The use of victimage implies that you should be thankful for the support a loved one gives even though if it results in actions you might not agree with. The lack of mortification implies that couples should always try to cheer each other up. The different messages that are implied through each assessment gives an overall example of what elements exist in strong married couple according to the writers. The episode is an example of the different audiences that this show reaches. Being aired in the evening on the Fox Network implies that the show is being watched by all different ages. The animation and jokes offer entertainment for kids while the underlying messages and morals appeal to the adults that watch this show. The show is able to compete with other series that might only appeal to a certain type of viewer. The amount of levels that this episode reaches is an indication of how complex the show is and why the show is still going strong today.


One thought on “The Twisted Dramatic Perspective of Homer and Marge Simpson

  1. I would like to start off by saying that although I am familiar with the show The Simpsons, I have not come to see the particular episode discussed in this rhetorical critic’s analysis. However, regardless of my unfamiliarity prior to reading this dramatic analysis, the author was very helpful in summarizing the critical and important facts of the episode. In this dramatic analysis, the critic focuses on the idea that the television show The Simpsons portrays various instances and characteristics present in married couples.
    Using transcendence as means for describing the motive was very intelligent since almost the entire episode was based on Homer Simpson following a higher calling- the love for his wife Marge Simpson. However, I feel as though Homer had not one, but two ways to absolve of his guilt, the second one being mortification. Although Homers transcendence was clearly depicted through his sympathy for Marge, his expression of mortification was evident in the second last sentence of paragraph six when the author stated that “Homer starts blaming himself for failing every time he tried to help Marge”. Furthermore, the way the critic had broken down the pentad was extremely helpful in understanding the episode more clearly and was an organized representation of summing the information using a dramatic perspective.
    Although the critic mentioned Homer as being a comic fool, there is more that could have been mentioned to make the argument even more effective. As stated by the author, Marge’s tolerance of Homers lack of intelligence caused her to forgive him, titling him a comic fool, and as a result exemplifying successful couples and marriage. I slightly disagree with the relationship made between Homer’s comic fool character and a strong bond between married couples. The reason Marge puts up with Homer’s actions is because her standards for him are fairly low; she doesn’t expect much from him. I feel as though that Marge having to put up with this comic fool isn’t so much abiding by the vows of marriage- “through thick and thin”- but since she is left with no option but to bear Homer’s actions.
    Moreover, the terministic screens were not mentioned through this dramatic analysis, and I feel that they would have definitely enhanced the analysis. Enablers were evident when Homer was forgiven for his actions by Marge (as stated at the end of paragraph 5). His actions of hiring the mafia for Marge were justified by Homers lack of knowledge and absurd behaviours. Aside from enablers, deterrents were also present in the one instance in paragraph 6 when Marge expresses her love for Homer so he stops blaming himself for his actions.
    Additionally, the critic’s use of the word victimage seemed to have been slightly confusing. As stated by the critic in paragraph 4, “The use of victimage in this episode also amplifies the idea of how married couples should act with one another”. In other words, it seems as though this is stating that married couples should blame each other, and I personally feel it should be the exact opposite. A more appropriate way of using this word in the context would be to just refer to the point at which Marge was blaming Homer for hiring the mafia as a way to threaten and devour the franchises competing against Marge’s pretzel franchise. Also, the final paragraph states that since the show is aired on the Fox Network people of all ages, including young children, enjoy this television series. Unfortunately I would have to disagree with that statement since I have personally seen and am aware of young children who are not permitted to watch The Simpsons. Aside from this, I must agree with the critic with his argument about there are subliminal messages throughout the show appealing to an older and more mature audience.
    Overall, I feel that the critic did a very good job of examining this specific episode of The Simpsons with a dramatic perspective. This show is one that many people can say have watched or at least heard of before, making the summary of the episode and the critic’s analysis easier to interpret.

    Arusa Bozai

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s